The fifteen problems · 02 of 15 · translation

Machine translation is weak enough that human review is the product

For English content, human-in-the-loop is a quality upgrade; for Amharic it is the only viable path. The locked decision made English and reviewed Amharic peers, and it was violated within a day.

Recorded on 18 July 2026 in the video-production lane: for English content, human-in-the-loop is a quality upgrade; for Amharic it is the only viable path. A vendor's "175+ languages" checkbox and usable Amharic are different claims.

The locked site-design decision became: English and reviewed Amharic are peers; agents do not invent Amharic translations; every public Amharic string carries a visible reviewed or awaiting-review state.

× What it broke

The gate was violated within a day. A button label, አማርኛ, shipped with no review marker, alongside bare Ethiopic specimens in the design system. The archivist seat caught both in its three-defect design review.

✓ What it established

The fix kept the "reviewed" example as a Latin placeholder, explicitly stating that no Ethiopic string was yet certified. The project's working name still awaits native-speaker naming review. This site follows the same rule: every Amharic string here is awaiting review.

2026-07-18 (video lane) · 2026-07-22 (archivist design review) · build report §4.2 · retrieved 2026-08-21

Ask your AI about this page

Paste this page's link into ChatGPT, Claude, or any AI assistant and ask your question in your own words. Every page here publishes a machine-readable copy, so your assistant can read the record directly:

https://ethiopia-build.stoagen.com/problems/02/

Published . Last updated . Times come from this page's revision history and can be checked against it.